Wonderful to see all the action in this thread!
If you want some scandinavian input and don’t mind translating via Google Lens or similar transalation tools you can have a look at:
- The Norwegian template at https://arketyper.no/ckm/templates/1078.60.792/orgchart that seems to have a pretty nice structure for creating a complete report and clarifies where smaller clusters etc may belong in a larger structure. Does anybody know of similar template examples?
- A work in progress snapshot of Swedish models, currently focused on the microscopy part, see below:
-
Swedish concept model - useful for discussions. (The greener the box, the more mature/reviewed it is)
-
Rough Swedish information model - it will in the openEHR implementation case need to be replaced/expressed by templates/archetypes covering (at least) the same data content somehow. The light blue boxes are breast-cancer specific and the others are hoped to be more generally reusable for other cancers. Red border means more unfinished.
-
@ian.mcnicoll a a ‘show and tell’ call sounds like a nice idea! Does the Clinical Program Board (ping @joostholslag @vanessap @Paulmiller) and/or super-experienced modelers like @heather.leslie @siljelb or others be involved somehow?
Suggestions/thoughts:
- refreshing/creating a general archechetype for microscopic findings might be a good start
- and then (or simultaneously) testing compositional design patterns and/or specialiations to cater for breast cancer specific needs and perhaps some other cancer type (depending on participants’ interests).
- refreshing/creating a general archechetype for macroscopic findings
- …