Should EVENT_CONTEXT.setting be made optional and/or it's associated terminology updated?

Hi Erik,

I did raise this at a SEC meeting - I think there are a whole host of places in the RM e.g. setting or Normal_status in Quantity, where we either need ot be more pro-active in updating the ‘official codes’ or IMO better still makes these ‘examples’ in FHIR binding terms.

I did actually go through and document some suggestions somewhere - I’ll chase that up.

The Specs are actually a little vague on whether these existing codesets are mandatory andf eg, Better allow other normal_status codes where Ehrbase is stricter.

2 Likes