<sarcasm>Now here is a proposal we should all get behind!</sarcasm>
http://empowerhealthcare.blogspot.com/
PDF Healthcare
<sarcasm>Now here is a proposal we should all get behind!</sarcasm>
http://empowerhealthcare.blogspot.com/
PDF Healthcare
PDF is ubiquitous, makes complete sense.
.
.
.
.
.
.
not
![]()
PDF is ubiquitous, makes complete sense.
html is even more ubiquitious. I propose that
we use html.
Grahame
pdf files cannot be processed in a range of browsers used by disabled
end-users. The disabled, such as those with some level of vision
impairment or physical impairment e.g., need to be considered for a
truly international standard.
Juanita
Grahame Grieve wrote:
PDF would require at the very least the Adobe Acrobat Reader on the local machine to be read. While I understand the finality of using PDF for medical purposes, it becomes even more difficult to work with if you want to convert it to plan text for query purposes.
Eddy
I agree - I was only joking ![]()
PDF is a standard for creating and reading documents
Acrobat reader is free and equivalent free software (opensource in french). It
is indeed the need, in my opinion, the doctors, requesting documents.
However PDF is not done to create a system of information. This requires tools
(language) to enable the computer to swallow, sort and manipulate data.
It's totally different.
Best regard's
Dr R LONJON
France
Selon Eddy Rospide <edrs22@yahoo.com>: