Dear Helma
have been talking with Sergio Carmona about the update process of the website. Currently, update is completely live, which is convenient, but could also be dangerous, for obvious reasons.
It would be desirable to allow multiple people to work on the site, particularly for translation purposes and to have something like the following controls, to prevent us from publishing dumb mistakes - they do happen!
- define groups of users, e.g. openehr.cl group, openehr.jp group
- each group can have multiple users with modifying capability, including to only some parts of the website, e.g. /chile/ variant (however it is called)
- changes are not published instantly on save, but instead a nominated person or email address receives a message to indicate what has changed, and to review and ok it.
Note that I am not advocating a ‘heavy’ reviewing process, but rather a minimum editorial control so that any of us don’t break somehting major on the site due to an unintended error. Equally, we probably should be realistic and expect that logins to the site may be stolen one day and that a malicious users might deface the site, so for this reason, an authorisation step should be introduced to allow a check to be made before publishing; where errors are found, the proposed change is blocked.
So, the question is: can Daisy support this mode of working? Or somthing equivalent?
thanks,
- thomas
(attachments)
