Shouldn't:RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION_ITEM
original_resource_uri:
Hash<String, String>
really be:RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION_ITEM
original_resource_uri:
Hash<String, DV_URI>
???
Shouldn't:RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION_ITEM
original_resource_uri:
Hash<String, String>
really be:RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION_ITEM
original_resource_uri:
Hash<String, DV_URI>
???
Tim Cook wrote:
Shouldn't:RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION_ITEM
original_resource_uri:
Hash<String, String>really be:RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION_ITEM
original_resource_uri:
Hash<String, DV_URI>???
we originally kept out openEHR data types from the AOM spec (which this
bit of the model orginally came from, even though it is now in the
Common IM), because CEN wanted no dependence on openEHR in order to
standardise the AOM (which they have now done, and it is in train in
ISO). In hindsight, we should not have done this because CEN doesn't
have any sensible data types, and the openEHR URI data type would have
been fine. Nevertheless, having it as a string obviously doesn't prevent
it being a URI, it just means that you have to do a little bit of
processing to deal with it.
- thomas