I agree there probably needs to be some kind of 'glue archetype but I would see it as more of an administrative notion of a ‘tumour’ not necessarily tied in detail to a particular physical growth or body site, because the original focus might be quite misleading as the true picture emerges.
1 Like
Good afternoon all -
Hope you are ok.
I wanted to check if there has been any progress in this area. As well, I wanted to check if you think we could/should meet.
We have been working on some modelling, which we can probably share to discuss.
Thanks!
2 Likes
It would be good to report what we have been building, if only for people to react and tell us why we are wrong!! The field was Breast Cancer Pathology Reporting, primarily to meet Swedish standards but we have tried to align with ICCR as much as possible.
Hi @ian.mcnicoll and @mar.perezcolman,
Sounds good. I’ve been busy with other areas and have relinquished my duties re the breastprotocol, especially since @LindaAulin gave a heads up a while ago that we should get together to thrash something out. I’ll pick up the trail again. Marlene, will you be setting up the meeting?
Hi all,
I have created a poll to see when it would be best for everyone. If this is too soon I’ll look for another date further ahead.
Please mark your availability for: Pathology modelling - openEHR https://whenavailable.com/event/kXrBY98htd2YF4aQA
Good morning all -
I have received some replies regarding dates, and it isn’t going to be next week. It is probably going to be on Friday 26th 10-11 UK time (11-12 CET).
Could I confirm with @Maurice247 , @erik.sundvall and @siljelb if that would work for you?
Thanks!
1 Like
I may be able to make it at that time, although I do have conflicting meetings. However, don’t let it stop you if I can’t make it.
Apologies,
As per the email, this is the new poll:
Please mark your availability for: Pathology (part 3) https://whenavailable.com/event/uHWkEdvCBHpXvPvDA
1 Like