HL7 International and openEHR International are pleased to inform our collective communities that we are jointly considering aligning some of our standards and specifications for the global good. We believe that this will be beneficial for: The digital health ecosystem: in the long term, having s…

An announcement to the announcement is good enough @grahamegrieve ! Long journey yes but best done together…

I would expect that generating some derived reference materials from CKM archetypes could be one of the first steps, such as having the internal archetype subsets expressed as FHIR valuesets for their consumption https://linkehr.veratech.es/fhir/ Some first steps as deciding the base namespace of t…

[image] Pete_Bouvier: HL7 International and openEHR International are pleased to inform our collective communities that we are jointly considering aligning some of our standards and specifications for the global good. We believe that this will be beneficial for: The digital health ecosystem: …

I am so happy and proud this is becoming reality! I look very much forward to collaboration. Remko Schats, MD PhD MBA

This is great news. The community welcomes this. Looking forward to the unified future or standards. As an implementor, we’ve felt the pain over the years of trying to bridge the knowledge gap amongst our teams.

One thing that could really help this along would be to have the two respective online communities ( chat.fhir.org and discourse.openehr.org ) connected formally. This could be done as a (relatively) simple one-way limited integration between Zulip and Discourse using RSS , or a more comprehensive and…

Funny, I was just checking the fhir char for openEHR messages around this announcement. Could we set up two one way channels? E.g. an openEHR discourse topic that ‘reposts’ all messages from a specific fhir chat channel. And a fhir chat channel that ‘reposts’ all messages from a specific discourse t…

On the HL7 Zulip there’s a Zulip channel - you could reach out to the Zulip team to see what their plans re synchronization are. The HL7 Zulip has 28k users, so a switch to any other platform is unlikely to happen anytime soon. Having ActivityPub support in such forums would be a very nice featu…

I would say no to that. I don’t think HL7 and openEHR are that tightly coupled, we’ve already seen issues where X has a information model focus (openEHR and FHIR Profiles) and Y has process/workflow focus (FHIR API and IHE). I’d be worried that these types of users are coming from different contex…

[image] Nathan: a more comprehensive and effective implementation of ActivityPub using this: I think an ActivityPub link for discourse would be a great feature in any case. That would also allow people to get notified of (and in time maybe also follow and participate in?) discussions from Mas…

openEHR and HL7 Joint Announcement

openEHR news

joostholslag (Joost Holslag) 20 July 2024 14:39 36

Lets follow up this specific discussion here: connecting FHIR and openEHR

Topic		Replies	Views
openEHR on FHIR and vice versa Technical (archive)	21	120	19 December 2018
Relationship between FHIR and openEHR HL7 FHIR	22	14839	8 July 2024
openEHR and FHIR UKCore openEHR.uk	27	2062	6 May 2024
System integration vital signs Integration	15	237	27 November 2024
connecting FHIR and openEHR Integration	4	681	20 September 2024
openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 35, Issue 21 Clinical (archive)	6	38	26 March 2015
FHIR vs openEHR HL7 FHIR	66	8625	22 April 2025
OHDSI - and openEHR OHDSI OMOP standards	27	6145	25 October 2022
Lifecycle_state in EHRbase Platform ehrbase	32	2421	2 November 2021
aus health it Clinical (archive)	38	154	25 January 2007

openEHR and HL7 Joint Announcement

Related topics