I meant to say that an improved discussion of contributions is in section 5 of the draft of the next version of the rference model, at http://www.deepthought.com.au/health/openEHR/rm/ehr_rm_3_2draft.pdf
- thomas beale
I meant to say that an improved discussion of contributions is in section 5 of the draft of the next version of the rference model, at http://www.deepthought.com.au/health/openEHR/rm/ehr_rm_3_2draft.pdf
- thomas beale
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| proposal for contributions | 0 | 9 | 10 June 2002 | |
| CONTRIBUTION questions | 5 | 23 | 15 February 2007 | |
| New EHR reference model draft | 0 | 8 | 15 August 2002 | |
| new FAQ page - context in openEHR | 0 | 12 | 24 May 2016 | |
| ANNC: openEHR integration model; HL7v2 & CEN EN13606 interoperability | 0 | 12 | 22 September 2005 | |
| openEHR EHR Extract - new proposal posted | 0 | 11 | 9 October 2010 | |
| Can a single CONTRIBUTION ever affect two separate EHRs? | 2 | 14 | 28 January 2010 | |
| New draft of artefact identification proposal | 0 | 11 | 21 April 2013 | |
| 13606 2012 revision proposal | 0 | 6 | 4 March 2012 | |
| First cut CIMI-friendly RM | 0 | 7 | 2 April 2012 |