I is starting to stress me really. There are so many Archetypes available, and there are three tools in use by me to open them.
One is an archetype-analyzer, I wrote myself, a syntax checker.
The other is an Archetype Editor, written by those Swedish guys,
And one is an Archetype Editor from Ocean.
I wish there was a consistent set of Archetypes which can be opened by one or the other, and that it was documented as such.
I know, the problem is the moving target of changing ADL definitions. A little bit of help would do a lot, an error message which tells me what the problem is.
I know, this is not really a question.
But is it really the goal to stick to a certain kernel, write your archetypes, modify your editor so it can read your archetypes without crashes?
It is what I am doing know.
Maybe it is a good idea to hold developments to improve quality. I think this is needed. I am a bit into the things going around here, but a stranger, how can he ever believe there is something good happening?
I had to say this, I do not really expect an answer.
I is starting to stress me really. There are so many Archetypes available, and there are three tools in use by me to open them.
One is an archetype-analyzer, I wrote myself, a syntax checker.
The other is an Archetype Editor, written by those Swedish guys,
And one is an Archetype Editor from Ocean.
I wish there was a consistent set of Archetypes which can be opened by one or the other, and that it was documented as such.
Hi Bert,
there is and have been for a long time - the only official set is at openEHR, see there is - there is only one proper set of archetypes - at http://svn.openehr.org/knowledge/
These archetypes all pass the reference parser tests, and the Ocean Archetype editor and the ADL workbench are based on this parser.
I was just thinking to use some ADLv1.3 archetype files with java ADL parser.
Could anybody give a pointer to ADLv1.3 archetypes?
I could only find ADLv1.4 files here.http://my.openehr.org/wsvn/knowledge/