I must say, good news, it is possible to work with the
Archetype-editors, although there still are some quirks.
I like the Swedisch ArcehtypeEditor because of the (kind of) debugging
facility
And I like the Workbench,b ecause it gives a lot of flexibility.
It is too bad, that both do not seem to have (completely) the same
syntax-ideas, although, they match for over 99%.
I found some problems:
The Swedish editor does not want
language
original_language = <[ISO_639-1::en]>
and
language = <[ISO_639-1::en]>
in the header part, and
it wants to add
primary_language = <"en">
languages_available = <"en", ...>
in the ontology part, for the rest, they sem both to accept the same syntax
Just wanted to say that, good editors are very important. And good error
ahndling is very nice, don't shoot the archetype because of a small
error, try to be tolerant. (it asks a lot of programmers.)
There is another problem with the workbench, it "takes" without my
permission, the ADL-file-extension, and then fails to start if I
doubleclick on an ADL-file, with message:
Cannot run: 'icons' directory missing
Hit any key to exit application
I must regret, the Ocean ArchetypoEditor fails to open an Archetype
which opens without problem in the Workbench.
I also does not handle the error, but generates an Exception and remains
after that in an undefined condition.
The exception text, and debug trace is (maybe this helps to tackle the
problem)
(in between, I say, there is much improvement, which is very helpful for
my work)