ARCHETYPE_TERM is not referenced in AOM (and XML schema)

Implementers (archive)
1

term_attribute_names is listed in the AOM document
(pg 51) as type List<string> but surely this should be
of type List<ARCHETYPE_TERM>?

The XML schema have used the same definition
so they need to be fixed as well.

Andrew

2

Andrew Patterson wrote:

term_attribute_names is listed in the AOM document
(pg 51) as type List<string> but surely this should be
of type List<ARCHETYPE_TERM>?

The XML schema have used the same definition
so they need to be fixed as well.
  

no, it is correct as is - the attribute term_attribute_names is just
that - a list of names (strings).

- thomas beale

3

no, it is correct as is - the attribute term_attribute_names is just
that - a list of names (strings).

then it must be term_codes and constraint_codes that are
a list of ARCHETYPE_TERM (currently they are a list of
string as well).
Surely something in the AOM has to refer/store
the ARCHETYPE_TERM type?

Andrew

4

Andrew Patterson wrote:

no, it is correct as is - the attribute term_attribute_names is just
that - a list of names (strings).
    
then it must be term_codes and constraint_codes that are
a list of ARCHETYPE_TERM (currently they are a list of
string as well).
Surely something in the AOM has to refer/store
the ARCHETYPE_TERM type?
  

yes, that is correct. Actually, the ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY class should be
more fully defined than it is now in the AOM document.

- thomas