I would follow Ian’s recommendation regarding EL ![]()
We did a lot of work on BMM some 4 years ago (see the link at the bottom). Searching for EXPR_CONSTRAINT made me realize that EL classes in the 5. The Rules Package have no official BMM files.
I would follow Ian’s recommendation regarding EL ![]()
We did a lot of work on BMM some 4 years ago (see the link at the bottom). Searching for EXPR_CONSTRAINT made me realize that EL classes in the 5. The Rules Package have no official BMM files.
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bmm_Expression implementation for using in archetype rules | 4 | 586 | 10 February 2022 | |
| Expanding BMM | 8 | 184 | 8 June 2026 | |
| Expression Language syntax | 2 | 830 | 23 March 2020 | |
| Simple-to-Generic type conformance | 12 | 146 | 23 April 2026 | |
| `Operation` isn't specified in BMM nor in Foundation types, and Functional Meta-types uses | 5 | 71 | 23 July 2026 | |
| AOM2 `EXPR_ARCHETYPE_REF` inherits `EXPR_VALUE_REF` | 2 | 46 | 16 September 2025 | |
| Architectural Discussion: Inheritance Patterns, Generic Containers, and Override Semantics in BMM | 9 | 93 | 20 June 2026 | |
| Reference Model as Archetypes ? | 25 | 146 | 12 December 2018 | |
| Retrospective fix for tagging the form of BMM / P_BMM in use today | 6 | 659 | 4 July 2020 | |
| Incompatibility issues when using Archetype Designer’s Export Fileset *.t.json files | 7 | 692 | 29 August 2023 |