Hi Thomas,
I am updating the parser for handling adl_version in the header part. On
page 8 of AOM doc "added a new attribute adl_version: String to the
ARCHETYPE class", but there is no adl_version attribute in the ARCHETYPE
class description on p14. Maybe it's an overlook?
Rong
Rong Chen wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I am updating the parser for handling adl_version in the header part. On
page 8 of AOM doc "added a new attribute adl_version: String to the
ARCHETYPE class", but there is no adl_version attribute in the ARCHETYPE
class description on p14. Maybe it's an overlook?
you are right - some missed details; also missed the rename of
"concept_code"
see the new version online - these details should be correct now.
- thomas
Thomas Beale wrote:
Rong Chen wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I am updating the parser for handling adl_version in the header part. On
page 8 of AOM doc "added a new attribute adl_version: String to the
ARCHETYPE class", but there is no adl_version attribute in the ARCHETYPE
class description on p14. Maybe it's an overlook?
you are right - some missed details; also missed the rename of
"concept_code"
see the new version online - these details should be correct now.
Thanks for the quick update. One more detail, there is no place holder
for the flag controlled/uncontrolled from ADL (archetype header). Is
that something that the parser can ignore? Otherwise, there should be
somewhere to store it.
Rong