Why the type function of the PARTY_RELATIONSHIP retrun an instance of DV_TEXT

Technical (archive)
1

Dear all,

PARTY_RELATIONSHIP has a function named type, If type is the meaning of the relationships such as “employment”, “authority”, “health provision”, why type return DV_TEXT instead of DV_CODED_TEXT?

By this type (DV_TEXT) we cannot use terminology coding system?

Is there any future think, that does not implemented or documented yet?

2

Mahdi Asgari wrote:

Dear all,
PARTY_RELATIONSHIP has a function named type, If type is the meaning
of the relationships such as "employment", "authority", "health
provision", why type return DV_TEXT instead of DV_CODED_TEXT?
By this type (DV_TEXT) we cannot use terminology coding system?

DV_CODED_TEXT is a subclass of DV_TEXT.

As a general rule, you can use DV_CODED_TEXT for any feature of type
DV_TEXT.

- Peter