Why does the Terminology id table has no version instead this Stringbuild logic

Specifications RM
1

Shouldnt the RM have a dedicated version field also for query stability?

SNOMED-CT (VERSION) is what is currently in the spec.
That makes AQLs frankly quite annoying.
Also SNOMED has modules and versions would be good to not have
http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20230731 in the string

This has also major consequences if using a term server since then you want to use the url stuff usually which you cant since you cant put versionse like snomed.info/ct (12030120).

2

Could you share some context please? Iā€™m interested to understand your question.

3

the version of the terminology is embedded in the identifier, which makes it really clunky to use in any kind of terminology service

3 Likes