The joint openEHR/FHIR review of Allergy/Intolerance is open

Clinical (archive)
1

hi All

We have opened the joint openEHR/FHIR review of Allergy/Intolerance:

http://omowizard.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/inaugural-joint-archetype-review-by-hl7-openehr/
http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=2169

The review is open until July 28th. We would like to encourage
everyone to contribute to the review; whether you are a clinician, a
programmer, a systems analyst. Clinicians, it would be great if you
can reach out to your systems vendor and encourage them to
participate.

I particularly want to thank both Heather Leslie and Ian McNicoll for
putting an immense amount of work into preparing for this joint
review. (which means I also need to recognise Russ Leftwich, who also
put a great deal of time and energy into the process too)

Grahame

note: my blog post includes some helpful information for the HL7
community to engage with the review, and documentation of the CKM sign
up process. I'm planning to document the review process, but I haven't
got to that yet.

2

hi All

We have opened the joint openEHR/FHIR review of Allergy/Intolerance:

http://omowizard.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/inaugural-joint-archetype-review-by-hl7-openehr/
http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=2169

The review is open until July 28th. We would like to encourage
everyone to contribute to the review; whether you are a clinician, a
programmer, a systems analyst. Clinicians, it would be great if you
can reach out to your systems vendor and encourage them to
participate.

I particularly want to thank both Heather Leslie and Ian McNicoll for
putting an immense amount of work into preparing for this joint
review. (which means I also need to recognise Russ Leftwich, who also
put a great deal of time and energy into the process too)

Grahame

note: my blog post includes some helpful information for the HL7
community to engage with the review, and documentation of the CKM sign
up process. I'm planning to document the review process, but I haven't
got to that yet.

3

Why such a short time span? The MLHIM Technical Development Unit has one
of the largest and most diverse (domain expert wise)
groups of researchers on the planet that are familiar with openEHR, FHIR,
MLHIM and other healthcare concept models. Including
transformation/reconciliation between models.
Therefore, they are some of the most technically capable people, out of the
box. But people are busy and a two week time span to get meaningful
feedback is impossible.

Something like this should be open for at least 90 - 180 days, if there is
a time limit at all.

Cheers,
Tim

4

Hi everyone,

Just to follow up from yesterday’s announcement by Grahame, the first review invitations for the openEHR/ FHIR Adverse Reaction archetype have just been sent out.

It is possible that we will have some teething troubles with the joint review as it is the first time we have had joint HL7 and openEHR participation so please bear with us.

So if you have:

· Registered in the FHIR Adverse Reaction project using the http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#signUp_1013.30.10_75c49a0ef23ac1979d0ce910ea5da0ff link from either of the blog posts in Grahame’s email; OR

· Adopted the archetype; OR

· Participated in a previous review of the openEHR Adverse Reaction archetype;

then you should have received an email invitation containing a link to the archetype review itself. If you fit any of those categories and HAVEN’T received an email, first please check your Spam box and second, email ckm@oceaninformatics.com for help. We can check the status of your registration and resend the invitation if necessary.

If you would like to participate and haven’t registered or adopted yet, then please do so. The blogs provide information about how to join in: http://omowizard.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/inaugural-joint-archetype-review-by-hl7-openehr/ and

http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=2169

Next steps?

Once the 2 week review period is over, the Editorial team will collate the feedback and incorporate it into the next iteration of the archetype and send out for a further review. This process will likely be repeated a number of times, until there is a reasonable consensus or the Editors need to pragmatically ‘draw a line in the sand’ for an initial joint version. How this will evolve is not clear at this point.

There are two Editors representing HL7 and two from openEHR:

· Grahame Grieve (Australia), one of the primary authors of the FHIR specifications;

· Russ Leftwich (USA), an internist and immunologist who is a co-chair of the HL7 Patient Care Working Group;

· Ian McNicoll (UK), a clinician and informatician who is a board member of openEHR and co-leading the international CKM Editorial work; and

· myself (from Australia).

If you would like some further general information you can view these videos:

· How to Review an Archetype/DCM - this video was developed for the Australian CKM hosted by NEHTA, but apart from branding and reference to archetypes as DCMs the process is identical.

And of course, Help or Questions!:

· Any feedback about the joint review in general should probably be directed to grahame or myself, or preferably both.

· Any questions or queries about the practical issue re CKM registration or review process should be directed to ckm@oceaninformatics.com

Looking forward to your participation,

Kind Regards

Heather Leslie

Dr Heather Leslie
MBBS FRACGP FACHI
Director/Consulting Lead
Ocean Informatics
Phone - +61 418 966 670
Skype - heatherleslie
Twitter - @omowizard