I think that is a perfectly reasonable proposition @borut.jures.
@borut.fabjan - do you have any thoughts on this - can we easily support ‘unit property’ in tooling, without it being recorded explicitly in archetypes?
I think that is a perfectly reasonable proposition @borut.jures.
@borut.fabjan - do you have any thoughts on this - can we easily support ‘unit property’ in tooling, without it being recorded explicitly in archetypes?