David Rowen brought up an issue with the modeling of Diagnosis as being a specialized Problem. I concur and the comments in CKM are shown below.
The question is how do these issues get resolved - or will they not get resolved - once modeled can an archetype never change due to architecture e.g. the AQL requires the diagnosis to be in a specific place in a specific archetype so there will be resistance to change?
David Rowen brought up an issue with the modeling of Diagnosis as being a specialized Problem. I concur and the comments in CKM are shown below.
The question is how do these issues get resolved - or will they not get resolved - once modeled can an archetype never change due to architecture e.g. the AQL requires the diagnosis to be in a specific place in a specific archetype so there will be resistance to change?
it can change, in strictly controlled ways. What cannot change:
existing structure & paths,
meanings of existing at-codes
What can change:
new structure can be added
anything can be done to the meta-data elements, i.e. description, translations etc etc
These conditions guarantee that queries based on the previous revision of an archetype will not be invalidated by a more recent issue.
The International Health Terminology Standards Development
Organisation announced today that it is making source code for the
IHTSDO Workbench, including tools to develop, maintain, and facilitate
the use of SNOMED CT, freely available under an Apache2 open source
agreement.http://linuxmednews.com/1261512264
Cheers Carol
Dr Carol Hullin| Senior Health Informatics Advisor|
Office of Chief Information Officer | Department of Health
Level 13, 55 Collins Street, Melbourne Victoria 3001