possible conflict in DvDateTime <-> ADL combination

Reference Implementation: Java (archive)
1

Hi,

In ADL is possible to defineDate-Time pattern: yyyy-??-??T??:??:??

But there is no way, in the current DvDateTime to instantiate a class
with a string conform this ADL - spec.

I wonder if this is an error?

Thanks
Bert Verhees

2

I must express myself more clearly.

I mean, according to the ADL-spec this would make a great DateTime:
"2003" or should I write "2003T", the spec is not clear about that.
But a DateTime like those examples cannot be instantiated.

Is the ADL-spec wrong or is the Java-Reference-Model implemented wrong?

Thanks again
Bert

Op 24-09-10 13:29, Bert Verhees schreef:

3

The ISO 8601 spec requires the ‘T’ only if there is a time part.

  • thomas
(attachments)

OceanInformaticsl.JPG

4

Thanks, Thomas,

But my problem was that a DvDateTime cannot be constructed with “2003T” as string in the constructor, while it is possible to define a datetime-constrain like that.

Maybe this is a Java-specific problem.

Bert

Op 13-10-10 13:46, Thomas Beale schreef: