I’ve added this issue: http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/SPECPR-90
Maybe is just a typo on the specs, but I’d like to be sure.
pablo
(Pablo Pazos)
1
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| possible error small error in BaseTypes.xsd (version 1.0.1) | 6 | 31 | 15 April 2009 | |
| EHR specification | 2 | 18 | 22 November 2006 | |
| Little sync problem in Java-code regarding ResourceItem | 1 | 12 | 1 June 2017 | |
| some differences between specs and implementation | 1 | 13 | 28 December 2015 | |
| inconsistencies in naming of term_bindings and constraint_bindings attributes in XML-schema and PDF specs | 0 | 5 | 10 November 2008 | |
| Basetypes (schema/specification) | 6 | 29 | 21 December 2011 | |
| Bug in CDvQuantity implementation? | 5 | 25 | 22 July 2009 | |
| Inconsistency in demographic specs | 1 | 894 | 12 October 2022 | |
| Process for typographical corrections in openEHR specifications | 10 | 588 | 22 April 2020 | |
| Typo in Release 1.0.2 Release Note | 0 | 11 | 18 November 2009 |