I think having PARTY_IDENTIFED as a data value would be very helpful, along with adding role and organisation as attributes, and having other_details ITEM_TREE. I know we should be trying to manage all of this as references but it is practically impossible in many/most projects I am working on for now.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integration Information Model revamp | 31 | 1257 | 14 August 2020 | |
| Additional 'Participations' metadata item | 16 | 444 | 22 May 2024 | |
| Demographic archetypes for clinical record purposes | 43 | 2434 | 10 August 2023 | |
| PARTY data in EHR space | 1 | 486 | 21 September 2020 | |
| Organization of a party within the EHR | 29 | 1500 | 17 March 2023 | |
| Demographic model improvements | 47 | 2845 | 19 March 2025 | |
| Issues and ideas on the demographic model | 23 | 800 | 27 March 2023 | |
| Special treatment of "incomplete" VERSIONs | 33 | 1181 | 28 July 2020 | |
| Choice between data element and SLOT? | 41 | 2077 | 8 March 2021 | |
| SpO2 scale 2 decision | 33 | 1035 | 19 November 2025 |