Dear Grahame, I guess you mean the HL7 v3 approach: human readable and computable codes + unit that FHIR correctly adopted?
Vriendelijke groet,
Dr. William Goossen
Directeur Results 4 Care BV
+31654614458
WILLIAM_R4C
(WILLIAM R4C)
1
system
(system)
2
That's not the v3 approach - it's ucum only. If ever I revisited the v3 data types. That would be one of my priorities to fix.
Grahame
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 21 | 0 | 10 | 15 June 2017 | |
| openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 51, Issue 26 | 1 | 13 | 24 May 2016 | |
| openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 33, Issue 29 | 0 | 13 | 17 November 2014 | |
| openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 51, Issue 24 | 1 | 14 | 19 May 2016 | |
| openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 18, Issue 37 | 2 | 17 | 28 August 2013 | |
| openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 35, Issue 18 | 0 | 7 | 13 March 2015 | |
| ISO 21090 data types too complex? - (longish / CO challenge only) | 1 | 10 | 8 November 2010 | |
| openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 23, Issue 4 | 1 | 12 | 24 March 2014 | |
| openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 18, Issue 50 | 4 | 20 | 31 August 2013 | |
| openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 32, Issue 31 | 7 | 34 | 7 October 2014 |