I have created a 'Terminology' space on the wiki. Initially I would like
to get material from the recent IHTSDO meeting up there. The idea is to
create very clear guidelines for archetype design, and to ensure the
semantic congruence of archetypes and other aspects of openEHR with
terminology. Remembering of course that openEHR is designed to work with
any terminology, we will nevertheless be able to use a lot of the
thinking coming from IHTSDO and SNOMED-CT.
See http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Terminology+and+openEHR
If anyone wants to add a 'key issue' I suggest you do it by modifying or
commenting on the top-level page. Hopefully people from the terminology
community, ontology community and also people from user organisations
will help us collectively put some shape into this part of the wiki.
[note that for pure terminology-related discussions, of course the
resources of IHTSDO and other organisations are of course more
appropriate than here].
- thomas beale