@joostholslag please keep us in the loop how things are going for OPAL. Our architects made an evaluation and then decided to go with XACML 3.0 instead of OPAL, but I don’t have the details.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish openEHR procurements & RFIs | 27 | 7561 | 7 February 2024 | |
| Procurement requirements for an openEHR native forms tool | 25 | 608 | 24 October 2024 | |
| The honest story about implementing openEHR as an EHR-vendor | 9 | 2028 | 26 February 2026 | |
| Data extraction from openEHR - a demanding and challenging task? | 25 | 675 | 19 August 2025 | |
| How to start | 26 | 50 | 15 August 2013 | |
| Relationship openEHR/CIMI | 17 | 36 | 30 October 2014 | |
| lessons from Intermountain Health, and starting work on openEHR 2.x | 30 | 77 | 8 October 2012 | |
| Echocardiography - Change of "Imaging result" CLUSTER archetype? Reuse lab analyte design pattern for nested/repeated clusters? | 14 | 1044 | 28 May 2025 | |
| Approaches to Learning openEHR | 14 | 37 | 6 April 2016 | |
| Sweden’s noble e-Health strategy | 7 | 12 | 24 November 2010 |