@joostholslag please keep us in the loop how things are going for OPAL. Our architects made an evaluation and then decided to go with XACML 3.0 instead of OPAL, but I don’t have the details.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish openEHR procurements & RFIs | 27 | 7536 | 7 February 2024 | |
| Procurement requirements for an openEHR native forms tool | 25 | 557 | 24 October 2024 | |
| Data extraction from openEHR - a demanding and challenging task? | 25 | 599 | 19 August 2025 | |
| Echocardiography - Change of "Imaging result" CLUSTER archetype? Reuse lab analyte design pattern for nested/repeated clusters? | 14 | 1024 | 28 May 2025 | |
| access control for openEHR 'resources' | 27 | 725 | 5 November 2024 | |
| The Swedish openEHR platforms and tools RFI 2023 | 22 | 5031 | 13 May 2024 | |
| OHDSI - and openEHR | 27 | 5974 | 25 October 2022 | |
| The honest story about implementing openEHR as an EHR-vendor | 9 | 1857 | 26 February 2026 | |
| Relationship between FHIR and openEHR | 22 | 14623 | 8 July 2024 | |
| How to use the "Symptom/sign screening questionnaire" archetype | 18 | 1327 | 6 September 2023 |