We’ve been building some RM objects and have found that the implementation of ITEM_LIST differs from the spec. In the SPEC ITEM_LIST is composed of ELEMENTs whereas in the implementation it is composed of CLUSTERs.
Some questions:
Why did you decide to implement it this way?
In order to provide more generality should ITEM_LISTs not be composed of abstract ITEMS?
Does this not impose that archetypes containing ITEM_LISTS will have to define clusters and then ELEMENTS?
We’ve been building some RM objects and have found that the implementation of ITEM_LIST differs from the spec. In the SPEC ITEM_LIST is composed of ELEMENTs whereas in the implementation it is composed of CLUSTERs.
Some questions:
Why did you decide to implement it this way?
In order to provide more generality should ITEM_LISTs not be composed of abstract ITEMS?
Does this not impose that archetypes containing ITEM_LISTS will have to define clusters and then ELEMENTS?