Demographics Archetypes

Technical (archive)
1


All,

When I try to pull the demographics archetype from the following link on the OpenEHR website, I get a 404 error. Can someone test to see if they get the same error?

http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/openehr-demographic-person.person.draft.html

Thanks,

Eddy Rospide
|

2

I do

3

There are some here:
http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/

but at least some of them do not conform to the openEHR RM.

--Tim

5

hi

Two of the demographics archetypes are open for review : postal address
and person name. I appear to be the only one who has commented on
either, but the system seems to have lost my review of the person name
archetype?

I have mainly focused on interoperability with ISO 21090 (healthcare
datatypes, which include name and address). The archetypes are fairly
faithful to ISO 22220, and need a few features added to become effectively
interoperable with ISO 21090. Heather and I are working on this for a
future release of 22220.

In the meantime, the authors ask, what should the scope of these two archetypes
be? just a minimal 22220? My response is, they should have a few more specific
features added so that they are interoperable enough with 21090. Due to
differences in approach, it's never going to be 100%, but it doesn't
really need to
be. We can get to 99% fairly cheaply, and that's what I've aimed at in
my comments.

I thought I'd raise it on the list here and get comment to help with
the author's
principle question.

btw, to the authors: great job, thanks

Grahame

6

Grahame Grieve wrote:

hi

Two of the demographics archetypes are open for review : postal address
and person name. I appear to be the only one who has commented on
either, but the system seems to have lost my review of the person name
archetype?

Hi Grahame,

I can see your reviews of both archetypes in CKM, so be assured that
they are definitely not lost.
If you go to the person name archetype and select reviews, I can see it.
Not sure what the problem your are facing is? Don't you see it in a list
where you'd expect it?

Regards
Sebastian

7

Because when I went to check the review generally, the review wasn't listed
nor was the review cycle. (both are available for address)

Grahame

8

Hi Graham,

Thanks for the detailed reviews of both the Address and Name archetypes.

I can see your reviews and review cycles listed for both archetypes if I go to the Archetype concerned and then to Reviews - are you navigating differently.

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian@mcmi.co.uk

Clinical Analyst Ocean Informatics ian.mcnicoll@oceaninformatics.com
BCS Primary Health Care Specialist Group www.phcsg.org

2009/10/27 Grahame Grieve <grahame@kestral.com.au>