Hi Silje,
I have been thinking about this too. Note that the AD can export and XSL form a template - not perfect but might have some value. I made these notes about a week ago - seems a good time to share. I have access to some student resource.
Can you describe in more detail the gaps in the Ocean HTML format, and I will see what my guys might be able to do?
Ian
Github-based Archetype and Template viewer/ simple comment facility
The COVID-19 pandemic is helping show how openEHR can help folks build rapid datasets and applications but it is also throwing up some challenges.
Although CKM is a great tool (in fact uniquely so) for managing and reviewing archetypes, it is less suited for template visualisation and reviews, particularly these that are close to application deployment.
CKM requires very tight governance of archetype versions (quite reasonably) but this can make uploading and maintaining rapidly -iterating templates something of a challenge, though ultimately ‘doable’
More significantly, CKM (and the attendant Clinical modelling team methodology) is not well suited to what might be called rapid template development i.e accepting that good modelling takes time but hat implementation often means we need to compromise. Paradoxically the CKM modelling methodology also anticipates breaking change prior to publication, whereas a rapidly iterating template, mirroring fast changes in content demands stability and avoidance of breaking change.
We can expect a great number of openEHR implementers to wish to share their archetypes and templates, which although in many cases will be baed on existing models, will almost certainly have some localised or even ‘ugly’ modelling - mine included.
I think there is still huge value in communal learning and considerable peer-to-peer reuse of both ideas and model.
What is really missing is tool that can allow some kind of archetype and, critically, template visualisation, of archetypes and templates that are sitting in an open GiHub repository. The tool would itself simply allow someone to enter the URL + repo of that repository and could itself be cloud-based. Any commenting, CRs etc could be handled directly via Github functionality.
I am not aware of any one web-based tool that allows this. I think to have maximum impact it would ideally be open-source, though open to other suggestions.
I am conscious that many existing tooling vendors have some sort of similar capacity but is clearly important that users do not feel locked in to a particular tool, arduous sign-up process (I done think it needs one).
Features
- Web based visualisation of a set of folders that contain a number of archetypes and templates
- Point the tool at a specific URL - almost certainly a GitHub repo
- assume a standard folder layout or perhaps (as DIPS have) an optional root folder config file (on the repo itself) that maps to another folder layout
- List archetypes
- List templates
- view a specific archetype
- view a specific template
Commenting for now done via GitHub itself
I am aware of a number of implementers that may have tooling that can be quickly adapted (or code to contribute)
Possible collaborators
Ocean Health systems
DIPS
Cabolabs
NEDAP
Better
Prof Liu’s team
Diego Bosca LinkEHR
.opt -> web template convertor service
One other very useful addition to this tool would be something that generates something like thew Better Web template from a .opt
- the opt is faithful to the AOM and is the source of truth but is it very hard for newbies to understand. Some kind of free web-based .opt
-> web template
(or similar) convertor would allow others to much more easily contribute to better visualisations and additional functionality. I have undergrad students working with web templates already - .opt is just too hard!!