If yes - the ADL-Serialiser needs to be updated as it causes a null
pointer exception (I could probably do this)
if not - could or should that archetype be fixed?
Cheers
Sebastian
Dr Sebastian Garde
Dr. sc. hum., Dipl.-Inform. Med, FACHI
Faculty of Business and Informatics, Central Queensland University
Austin Centre for Applied Clinical Informatics, Austin Health
Heidelberg Vic 3084, Australia
This seems to be valid according to the C_DV_ORDINAL class definition from openEHR Archetype Profile. It means a CDvOrdinal object without any specific constraint (anyAllowed=true). The adl-parser can already handle this.
in Element[at0005]
is that legal ADL?
If yes - the ADL-Serialiser needs to be updated as it causes a null pointer exception (I could probably do this)
Yes, I think the adl-serializer needs to be updated. It will be great if you can do it.