# \#obstetrics

**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/tag/obstetrics/43.md

[Latest](https://discourse.openehr.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://discourse.openehr.org/categories.md) · [Tags](https://discourse.openehr.org/tags.md)

---

## [Obstetric summary (EVALUATION.obstetric\_summary)](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/obstetric-summary-evaluation-obstetric-summary/676)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@maritalice](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/maritalice)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [12 May 2020 11:08 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/obstetric-summary-evaluation-obstetric-summary/676 "2020-05-12T11:08:57Z")

</div>

This archetype has been through 5 review rounds. There seems to be consensus among the reviewers. The archetype will be published on May 15. Link to the archetype: https://openehr.org/ckm/archetypes/1013.1.1093 . Pleas…

---

## [Representation of variation in pregnancy](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/representation-of-variation-in-pregnancy/442)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@heather.leslie](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/heather.leslie)\
**Replies:** 7\
**Last updated:** [10 March 2020 10:00 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/representation-of-variation-in-pregnancy/442 "2020-03-10T10:00:13Z")

</div>

@SEC - there is maybe a related use case with pregnancy, where we need to describe a due date as a Duration data type expressed in weeks but with a variation of x days eg 34 weeks +/- 7 days. I’m wondering if there is a…