# \#ckm

**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/tag/ckm/14.md

[Latest](https://discourse.openehr.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://discourse.openehr.org/categories.md) · [Tags](https://discourse.openehr.org/tags.md)

---

## [Towards a mandate model for archetype reviews: predefined reviewer requirements and entry criteria](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/towards-a-mandate-model-for-archetype-reviews-predefined-reviewer-requirements-and-entry-criteria/17425)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Igor\_Schoonbrood](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Igor_Schoonbrood)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [2 November 2026 10:31 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/towards-a-mandate-model-for-archetype-reviews-predefined-reviewer-requirements-and-entry-criteria/17425 "2026-11-02T10:31:40Z")

</div>

Hi all, In the Netherlands we are setting up a national CKM under the coordination of Nictiz, with a pilot starting in January 2027. Modelling will be done in a federated way: regional programmes, vendors and national p…

---

## ["Persistent" Compositions not persistent](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/persistent-compositions-not-persistent/2982)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@yampeku](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/yampeku)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [15 December 2025 16:02 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/persistent-compositions-not-persistent/2982 "2025-12-15T16:02:55Z")

</div>

There are in the CKM several Composition archetypes that seem to imply a persistent category but have the event code fixed to event. This happens at least on all the composition list archetypes (adverse reaction list, me…

---

## [Problematic restrictions on translations](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/problematic-restrictions-on-translations/11602)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@varntzen](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/varntzen)\
**Replies:** 10\
**Last updated:** [4 December 2025 15:27 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/problematic-restrictions-on-translations/11602 "2025-12-04T15:27:55Z")

</div>

Some copyright holders of scores or scales have restrictions on translation of their scores. They want to approve that the translation is correct, which is understandable. Once an archetype is uploaded to the CKM ,it is…

---

## [Draft Term Bindings for Published Archetypes](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/draft-term-bindings-for-published-archetypes/6874)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@sebastian.garde](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/sebastian.garde)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [28 May 2025 17:51 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/draft-term-bindings-for-published-archetypes/6874 "2025-05-28T17:51:28Z")

</div>

Hi all, With more and more published archetypes in CKM, there has been an increasing concern regarding PUBLISHED archetypes that it may not be immediately clear that the term bindings associated with an archetype are of…

---

## [Is there a local CKM in Australia?](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/is-there-a-local-ckm-in-australia/5791)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@naveen.rajkumar](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/naveen.rajkumar)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [23 October 2024 11:14 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/is-there-a-local-ckm-in-australia/5791 "2024-10-23T11:14:45Z")

</div>

I see here there is a local CKM instance for Australia, is it active or any leads on it? https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/healthmod/pages/28409863/CKM+Instances+-+Details And is there any further information (…

---

## [How to manage archetypes in incubators](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/how-to-manage-archetypes-in-incubators/4980)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Olha\_Nikolaieva](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Olha_Nikolaieva)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [23 August 2024 08:59 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/how-to-manage-archetypes-in-incubators/4980 "2024-08-23T08:59:33Z")

</div>

@varntzen @siljelb My colleagues and I at University Hospital Basel have recently developed a new archetype for the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. We are eager to make this archetype publicly available and integrate it int…

---

## [Occurrences bug on export of .adls archetype](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/occurrences-bug-on-export-of-adls-archetype/5430)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@siljelb](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/siljelb)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [3 July 2024 12:48 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/occurrences-bug-on-export-of-adls-archetype/5430 "2024-07-03T12:48:33Z")

</div>

While testing exporting .adls templates re: this thread, I stumbled upon what I have to think is a bug. Steps to reproduce: Note the ELEMENT\[at0011\] occurrences matches {0..\*} matches { -- Mitigation factor of the O…

---

## [Archetype dependencies in the CKM](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-dependencies-in-the-ckm/4704)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@pablo](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/pablo)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [28 November 2023 09:45 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-dependencies-in-the-ckm/4704 "2023-11-28T09:45:00Z")

</div>

Is there a way to display archetype dependencies in the CKM? Like, if I’m on archetype A, which archetypes are used from A and which archetypes use A. When I say “use”, it would be: any specializations/generalization…

---

## [Tool or process to fix obsolete references in archetypes? Example: media\_capture renamed to media\_file](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/tool-or-process-to-fix-obsolete-references-in-archetypes-example-media-capture-renamed-to-media-file/2742)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@erik.sundvall](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/erik.sundvall)\
**Replies:** 15\
**Last updated:** [15 September 2022 11:12 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/tool-or-process-to-fix-obsolete-references-in-archetypes-example-media-capture-renamed-to-media-file/2742 "2022-09-15T11:12:47Z")

</div>

I have several times found (and reported) references to no-longer-existing archetypes in different archetypes. Perhaps the CKM should be enhanced with a function to scan and detect these things as they happen. (An analo…

---

## [Translations after archetype version update - how to overcome confusions](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/translations-after-archetype-version-update-how-to-overcome-confusions/2793)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@erik.sundvall](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/erik.sundvall)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [30 June 2022 21:01 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/translations-after-archetype-version-update-how-to-overcome-confusions/2793 "2022-06-30T21:01:48Z")

</div>

Hi! A hint to others getting confused. I didn’t quite understand the CKM translation upon/after version change. Since the archetype was now in v1 and is missing Swedish translation (also see P.S. below) I thought I’d c…

---

## [General question on use of specialisation (particularl in Clusters)](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/general-question-on-use-of-specialisation-particularl-in-clusters/805)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)\
**Replies:** 15\
**Last updated:** [23 June 2020 16:14 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/general-question-on-use-of-specialisation-particularl-in-clusters/805 "2020-06-23T16:14:14Z")

</div>

I was perusing CKM recently looking for archetypes to plug into a slot whose logical definition is ‘any kind of physical examination’. This seem doable, since CKM has a specialisation hierarchy: However, I see no spec…

---

## [First editorial review of 'Living will' archetype](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/first-editorial-review-of-living-will-archetype/311)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@ian.mcnicoll](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/ian.mcnicoll)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [5 February 2020 14:06 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/first-editorial-review-of-living-will-archetype/311 "2020-02-05T14:06:43Z")

</div>

The Living will archetype has been through a first review and we have setup a Doodle poll for the first editorial review of the comments made. with a few critical invitees but others are welcome to join, if you’d like…
