# wiki organisation

**Category:** [Clinical (archive)](https://discourse.openehr.org/c/clinical-archive/153)
**Created:** 2009-10-13 23:47 UTC
**Views:** 5
**Replies:** 2
**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/wiki-organisation/14936

---

## Post #1 by @thomas.beale

I have just been looking around the openEHR wiki, and while I respect the fact that wikis are a place of creative anarchy, I wonder if some of the following pages could be better placed:

- the MedInfo submission page is currently in the Health Information Models space ([http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/Draft+-+Medinfo+clinical+workshop+submission+2010](http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/Draft+-+Medinfo+clinical+workshop+submission+2010)) when a more obvious place would probably be the conferences page at [http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/Conferences](http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/Conferences)
- There is a description of CKM webservices at [http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/CKM+Webservices](http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/CKM+Webservices) which would be better in the specifications / services area (although the exact location for this has yet to be created)
With respect to other subject areas...

I propose to create a Terminology space on the wiki. Having attended the IHTSDO meeting last week, along with many other openEHR people, I believe it is time to get moving on formal descriptions of terminology bindings. I personally learned some very useful things in Washington last week, and I am sure others did. So I think we need a space to record it.

Secondly, it is time to start introducing proposals for services to the wiki. I propose to provide an initial description of what I think is a good basic general model of services for openEHR, and experts here should feel free to modify this, and develop it into a shape we think will work. Secondly we will solicit service definitions from existing implementers to be described on the wiki. This will give the community a basis for moving toward a set of quality, well-designed, and 100% compatible service specifications.

If people have other ideas about how this should be done, all feedback welcome.

- thomas beale

---

## Post #2 by @heather.leslie

Hi Thomas,

What can we do about emails being rejected from the lists - I sent one on Friday evening re the Medinfo submission and only found out that it had been rejected 4 days later as it was 'too big'. Surely assessment of size is an automated process and I could have been notified earlier, even immediately - it has cost us 3 days of collaboration when time was already short.

Heather

---

## Post #3 by @thomas.beale

Heather Leslie wrote:

---


**Canonical:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/wiki-organisation/14936
**Original content:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/wiki-organisation/14936