# Why is location code only a string? **Category:** [Specifications](https://discourse.openehr.org/c/specifications/6) **Created:** 2021-04-20 09:25 UTC **Views:** 550 **Replies:** 1 **URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/why-is-location-code-only-a-string/1481 --- ## Post #1 by @johnmeredith We're working on patterns for making sure our document meta model is mapped to incoming openEHR compositions. One such element concerns `location` code. An example in structured JSON: ``` "event_context": [ { "start_time": [ "2021-04-19T14:36:49.691+01:00" ], "setting": [ { "|code": "232", "|value": "secondary medical care", "|terminology": "openehr" } ], "_location":[ { "|id": "RQFH5", "|id_scheme": "LocationCode", "|id_namespace": "wrds.wales.nhs", "|name": "Velindre Cancer Center" } ], "_health_care_facility": [ { "|id": "RQF", "|id_scheme": " OrganisationCode ", "|id_namespace": "wrds.wales.nhs", "|name": "Velindre NHS Trust" } ], "_participation": { "|id": "123456F", "|id_scheme": "GMC", "|id_namespace": "uk.org.gmc", "|name": "Dr Jake Jones", "|function": "Attending Clinician" } } ] ``` The above element from `"_location":` gets stripped out and stored as a string. Is there a reason for this? As a workaround we would need to store the above elsewhere but I would like to find out what the preferred pattern should be? --- ## Post #2 by @thomas.beale That field is a PARTY_IDENTIFIED in EhrScape format, consisting of the `name` field, and then a flattened & modified form of `identifiers` (type `DV_IDENTIFIER`), limited to one instance, i.e. the `id_xxx` parts. We should have that documented in the [Simplified Data Formats](https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/SM/latest/serial_data_formats.html#_openehr_reference_model_data_value_types), but we don't yet. I think the most obvious suggestion to get this into a single string would be to support a compressed form of PARTY_IDENTIFIED, which includes a compressed form of DV_IDENTIFIER. The latter, using this example could be: `"wrds.wales.nhs::LocationCode::::RQFH5"`. or similar (we need to agree the field order). The general pattern would be something like: `issuer::type::assigner::id`. This would need to be combined with the remaining `name` field, in this case, `"Velindre Cancer Center"`, maybe something like this: `"Velindre Cancer Center|wrds.wales.nhs::LocationCode::::RQFH5"`. I'm not 100% sure of the EhrScape field mappings to the openEHR RM types here. --- **Canonical:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/why-is-location-code-only-a-string/1481 **Original content:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/why-is-location-code-only-a-string/1481