# Terminology / information model interface

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/terminology-information-model-interface/16219>\
**Category:** Technical (archive)\
**Created:** [17 November 2009 18:13 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/terminology-information-model-interface/16219 "2009-11-17T18:13:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/thomas.beale/32/35_2.png) [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)\
**Post date:** [17 November 2009 18:13 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/terminology-information-model-interface/16219/1 "2009-11-17T18:13:11Z")

</div>

I have published some initial notes on the issue of the interface  
between the information model (in openEHR, this is generally archetypes,  
with a bit of reference model) - see  
[http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Information+Model+-+Terminology+Equivalence](http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Information+Model+-+Terminology+Equivalence)

I am interested to know in particular what others think about the Snomed  
context model, including the Temporal context, Finding context,  
Procedure context, and the problem of trying to represent values in Snomed.

- thomas beale