# TBD\_10

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/tbd-10/15666>\
**Category:** Technical (archive)\
**Created:** [4 June 2002 05:24 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/tbd-10/15666 "2002-06-04T05:24:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_Cook5](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Tim\_Cook5](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Tim_Cook5)\
**Post date:** [4 June 2002 05:24 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/tbd-10/15666/1 "2002-06-04T05:24:48Z")

</div>

Suggestion: Send DV\_PHYSICAL\_DATA to the bit bucket.  
I agree that those instances should be archetyped.

Tim Cook

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/thomas.beale/32/35_2.png) [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)\
**Post date:** [4 June 2002 09:34 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/tbd-10/15666/2 "2002-06-04T09:34:53Z")

</div>

Tim Cook wrote:

> Suggestion: Send DV\_PHYSICAL\_DATA to the bit bucket. I agree that those instances should be archetyped.

that's 2 votes for the bin (me and Tim)!

- thomas beale

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Sam](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Sam)\
**Post date:** [4 June 2002 16:32 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/tbd-10/15666/3 "2002-06-04T16:32:39Z")

</div>

This was meant to be a data type for the physical location of something - an  
Xray film, specimen etc. I agree that this should be an archetype.

Cheers, Sam