# SpO2 scale 2 decision

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/spo2-scale-2-decision/3586>\
**Category:** Clinical\
**Tags:** archetype\
**Created:** [17 February 2023 10:20 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/spo2-scale-2-decision/3586 "2023-02-17T10:20:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ian.mcnicoll](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/ian.mcnicoll/32/4430_2.png) [@ian.mcnicoll](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/ian.mcnicoll)\
**Post date:** [19 November 2025 12:25 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/spo2-scale-2-decision/3586/33 "2025-11-19T12:25:16Z")

</div>

Excellent . Do we need to also have a local codesystem, for folks who can’t use SNOMED for licensing reasons? Or is this something to negotiate with SNOMED as a set of free terms?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/spo2-scale-2-decision/3586)._