'Self-reported data' is ready for publication

[erik.sundvall]

@ian.mcnicoll

There is an argument that because it will break changes in Web-template paths and related artefacts like FLAT examples, that this merits popping it up to V2

I don’t think we at Karolinska have any strong opinions on exact versioning (even though I brought it up) but we very much would like to see a corrected version of the archetype published as soon as possible.

Another unrelated note bit relevant to the thread:

@thomas.beale

Moving the basic distinction between patient- and professional-generated data to archetype level does not sound like a good idea I have to say, and is contrary to the basic design of openEHR.

Setting the COMPOSITION.composer to PARTY_SELF is another option to distinguish a whole composition as self reported. Does that seem sensible to @thomas.beale and others?

This archetype is not a tooling workaround, it is needed anyway, not for detection of provider/composer, but because there are no other composition archetypes suitable for a combination of self reported things (e.g. questionnaires and measurements - often combined) if you look at the purpose of existing ones. Most of them are explicitly declared as meant for different clinical settings.