# Represenation of \_feeder\_audit\_details in JSON

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/represenation-of-feeder-audit-details-in-json/5051>\
**Category:** Formats\
**Created:** [26 March 2024 12:30 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/represenation-of-feeder-audit-details-in-json/5051 "2024-03-26T12:30:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pablo](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/pablo/32/3505_2.png) [@pablo](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/pablo)\
**Post date:** [30 March 2024 00:41 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/represenation-of-feeder-audit-details-in-json/5051/21 "2024-03-30T00:41:53Z")

</div>

If you follow the conversation, I didn’t say he shouldn’t use that format at all or try to convince him otherwise, I just provided facts about the format not being an approved standard yet, to be careful and to expect differences between implementations. At least that was my intention.

If you think I’m not technically correct here, please point where I did say something incorrect and I’ll amend what I said accordingly.

Also, where did I say I don’t care about the format? I’m not following you here.

Let’s keep the discussion technical and not personal, we are all friends here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnmeredith](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/johnmeredith/32/1914_2.png) [@johnmeredith](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/johnmeredith)\
**Post date:** [9 April 2024 17:54 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/represenation-of-feeder-audit-details-in-json/5051/22 "2024-04-09T17:54:30Z")

</div>

Wow. That got spicy. 🧌

[Previous page](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/represenation-of-feeder-audit-details-in-json/5051.md?page=1)