# release tag for 1.0.1

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/release-tag-for-1-0-1/12810>\
**Category:** Reference Implementation: Java (archive)\
**Created:** [29 June 2008 16:02 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/release-tag-for-1-0-1/12810 "2008-06-29T16:02:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2008 16:02 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/release-tag-for-1-0-1/12810/1 "2008-06-29T16:02:13Z")

</div>

Dear all,

I intend to create a release tag for release-1.0.1, which is really a read-only copy of the current Trunk. Compared with the Branch release-1.0.1-RC (release candidate), the current Trunk has been improved considerably. I think the time is right to declare Release-1.0.1 and move on to other tasks, e.g. this would allow us to start to implement the CRs aimed for Release-1.0.2 on the Trunk.

Any reaction to this?

Cheers,  
Rong

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [4 July 2008 06:47 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/release-tag-for-1-0-1/12810/2 "2008-07-04T06:47:18Z")

</div>

Hi Rong,

sorry for the delay…yes I think that is a good idea.

There is one thing, in Archetype.java

the two methods

- Find input name by node path

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [4 July 2008 09:13 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/release-tag-for-1-0-1/12810/3 "2008-07-04T09:13:42Z")

</div>

> Hi Rong,
> 
> sorry for the delay…yes I think that is a good idea.
> 
> There is one thing, in Archetype.java
> 
> the two methods
> 
> - Find input name by node path
> - 
> - @param path
> - @return null if path unknown  
> \*/  
> public String inputByPath(String path) {  
> return pathInputMap.get(path);  
> }
> 
> /\*\*
> 
> - Find node path by input name
> - 
> - @param input
> - @return null if input unknown  
> \*/  
> public String pathByInput(String input) {  
> return inputPathMap.get(input);  
> }
> 
> will always return null - as the code that fills the maps (loadInternalRefs()) is in comments.  
> Is there a problem with this or why was it turned off?

Hi Sebastian,

These are the relics of the archetype based object creation/validation support in the AOM. The current plan is to separate the logic for validation/creation from AOM, so there is no need to have these methods. I will remove them from the Archetype class.

Cheers,  
Rong