# [ref_impl_eiffel] [527] AWB-15: In ARCHETYPE, similar to revision 525's change for ontology, archetype_id and defintion could never be Void, so there was no point in ARCHETYPE_VALIDATOR.validate_basics checking whether they were Void.

**Category:** [Reference Implementation: Eiffel (archive)](https://discourse.openehr.org/c/reference-implementation-eiffel-archive/161)
**Created:** 2008-02-21 01:51 UTC
**Views:** 5
**Replies:** 0
**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-527-awb-15-in-archetype-similar-to-revision-525s-change-for-ontology-archetype-id-and-defintion-could-never-be-void-so-there-was-no-point-in-archetype-validator-validate-basics-checking-whether-they-were-void/12804

---

## Post #1 by @svn1

Revision: 527
Author:   peter\.gummer

Log Message:

---


**Canonical:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-527-awb-15-in-archetype-similar-to-revision-525s-change-for-ontology-archetype-id-and-defintion-could-never-be-void-so-there-was-no-point-in-archetype-validator-validate-basics-checking-whether-they-were-void/12804
**Original content:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-527-awb-15-in-archetype-similar-to-revision-525s-change-for-ontology-archetype-id-and-defintion-could-never-be-void-so-there-was-no-point-in-archetype-validator-validate-basics-checking-whether-they-were-void/12804