# [ref_impl_eiffel] [479] Correct some anomalies in displaying Archetype id for archetypes that did not compile. **Category:** [Reference Implementation: Eiffel (archive)](https://discourse.openehr.org/c/reference-implementation-eiffel-archive/161) **Created:** 2008-01-29 20:11 UTC **Views:** 1 **Replies:** 2 **URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734 --- ## Post #1 by @svn1 Revision: 479 Author: thomas\.beale Log Message: --- ## Post #2 by @system svn@openehr\.org schreef: > Revision: 479 > Author: thomas\.beale > Date: 2008\-01\-29 20:11:01 \+0000 \(Tue, 29 Jan 2008\) > > Log Message: > \-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\- > Correct some anomalies in displaying Archetype id for archetypes that did not compile\. > > Modified Paths: > \-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\- >     BRANCHES/specialisation/apps/adl\_workbench/src/main/main\_window\.e >   Hi Thomas, can you please tell me why this happens in BRANCHES\. I was thinking that TRUNK is the working/changing version, but perhaps this is my mistake\. It confuses me, should I follow TRUNK to have the latest \(the greatest :\-\), or do I need to look at another place? Thanks Bert --- ## Post #3 by @thomas.beale Bert Verhees wrote: > svn@openehr\.org schreef: >   > > Hi Thomas, can you please tell me why this happens in BRANCHES\. I was > thinking that TRUNK is the working/changing version, but perhaps this is > my mistake\. > It confuses me, should I follow TRUNK to have the latest \(the greatest > :\-\), or do I need to look at another place? >   this work is being done on the specialisation branch, because it is a large set of changes adding specialisation and compiling capabilities to the AWB\. Try building the specialsiation branch, it is generally in good shape, and is the 'latest and greatest' version of the tool\. Peter is selectively feedin its changes in to the Trunk as time goes on\. We will announce a release of the specialisation version soon\. \- thomas --- **Canonical:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734 **Original content:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734