# \[ref\_impl\_eiffel\] \[479\] Correct some anomalies in displaying Archetype id for archetypes that did not compile.
**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734
**Category:** Reference Implementation: Eiffel (archive)
**Created:** [29 January 2008 20:11 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734 "2008-01-29T20:11:02Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@svn1](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/svn1)
#### Post date: [29 January 2008 20:11 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734/1 "2008-01-29T20:11:02Z")
Revision: 479
Author: thomas.beale
Log Message:
---
### Author:  [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [30 January 2008 08:04 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734/2 "2008-01-30T08:04:48Z")
svn@openehr.org schreef:
> Revision: 479
> Author: thomas.beale
> Date: 2008-01-29 20:11:01 +0000 (Tue, 29 Jan 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Correct some anomalies in displaying Archetype id for archetypes that did not compile.
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
> BRANCHES/specialisation/apps/adl\_workbench/src/main/main\_window.e
>
Hi Thomas, can you please tell me why this happens in BRANCHES. I was
thinking that TRUNK is the working/changing version, but perhaps this is
my mistake.
It confuses me, should I follow TRUNK to have the latest (the greatest
:-), or do I need to look at another place?
Thanks
Bert
---
### Author:  [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)
#### Post date: [30 January 2008 08:57 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/ref-impl-eiffel-479-correct-some-anomalies-in-displaying-archetype-id-for-archetypes-that-did-not-compile/14734/3 "2008-01-30T08:57:09Z")
Bert Verhees wrote:
> svn@openehr.org schreef:
>
>
> Hi Thomas, can you please tell me why this happens in BRANCHES. I was
> thinking that TRUNK is the working/changing version, but perhaps this is
> my mistake.
> It confuses me, should I follow TRUNK to have the latest (the greatest
> :-), or do I need to look at another place?
>
> this work is being done on the specialisation branch, because it is a
> large set of changes adding specialisation and compiling capabilities to
> the AWB. Try building the specialsiation branch, it is generally in good
> shape, and is the 'latest and greatest' version of the tool. Peter is
> selectively feedin its changes in to the Trunk as time goes on.
We will announce a release of the specialisation version soon.
- thomas