# possible error small error in BaseTypes.xsd (version 1.0.1)

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606>\
**Category:** Technical (archive)\
**Created:** [11 April 2009 09:30 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606 "2009-04-11T09:30:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [11 April 2009 09:30 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606/1 "2009-04-11T09:30:29Z")

</div>

According to the documentation  
([http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.1/architecture/rm/data\_types\_im.pdf](http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.1/architecture/rm/data_types_im.pdf)) should  
\<xs:complexType name="DV\_AMOUNT"\>  
be marked abstract.

Bert

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Heath\_Frankel3](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/e19b73/32.png) [@Heath\_Frankel3](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Heath_Frankel3)\
**Post date:** [14 April 2009 05:28 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606/2 "2009-04-14T05:28:54Z")

</div>

Hi Bert,  
Yes I agree, it should be

\<xs:complexType name="DV\_AMOUNT" abstract="true"\>  
...

Heath

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [14 April 2009 13:39 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606/3 "2009-04-14T13:39:26Z")

</div>

> Hi Bert,  
> Yes I agree, it should be
> 
> \<xs:complexType name="DV\_AMOUNT" abstract="true"\>

Thanks for the confirmation.

I am not in the position to repair it.

Bert

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/thomas.beale/32/35_2.png) [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)\
**Post date:** [14 April 2009 13:48 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606/4 "2009-04-14T13:48:27Z")

</div>

Bert,

can you raise this on the openEHR SPEC project tracker on Jira.

thanks

- thomas beale

Bert Verhees wrote:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [15 April 2009 08:07 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606/5 "2009-04-15T08:07:32Z")

</div>

Sorry Thomas, maybe it is a question of authorization, but Specification  
is not offered to me in Jira to add an Issue  
(the other projects are)

Bert

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Heath\_Frankel3](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/e19b73/32.png) [@Heath\_Frankel3](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Heath_Frankel3)\
**Post date:** [15 April 2009 09:49 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606/6 "2009-04-15T09:49:23Z")

</div>

Bert,  
You may not be in a position to repair it but you can log a problem report  
at [http://www/openEHR.org/jira](http://www/openEHR.org/jira) so the issue does not get lost.

Heath

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [15 April 2009 10:04 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/possible-error-small-error-in-basetypes-xsd-version-1-0-1/14606/7 "2009-04-15T10:04:18Z")

</div>

Heath,

the problem with that is that when "Create New Issue" is selected, the  
specification project is not available for selection for normal  
users...at least it isn't available for me.

Sebastian

Heath Frankel wrote: