Hi All,
We had a discussion about data-pointds being identified by archetype-path, not archetypenode-id.
I agree with that, but I am a bit confused how to do following.
consider following fantasy archetype
II would say that you just have to attach the remaining path from target node to the use_node path, so I would say first option is the right one
That seems to me the most logical too. Thanks, Diego! Bert
At the first use_node reference you have to add the target node_id at0007. You don’t have to repeat the “items” container attribute at the path, which is substituted by “attribute3”, but the target node id has to be used if it is not redefined by a new one, as in the case of “attribute4[at0005]”
[archetype_id]/attribute3[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
Yes, I think you are right, David, that seems logical too. I think you say this because the nodeId of the first following RMObject needs to be added, and that is in that case, if not overwritten by the use_node, the nodeId in the targetpath. Thank you very much Bert