# openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 51, Issue 17

**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/openehr-technical-digest-vol-51-issue-17/16542
**Category:** Technical (archive)
**Created:** [18 May 2016 20:30 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/openehr-technical-digest-vol-51-issue-17/16542 "2016-05-18T20:30:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![WILLIAM\_R4C](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/e99b99/32.png) [@WILLIAM\_R4C](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/WILLIAM_R4C)
#### Post date: [18 May 2016 20:30 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/openehr-technical-digest-vol-51-issue-17/16542/1 "2016-05-18T20:30:11Z")

</div>

Dear Grahame, I guess you mean the HL7 v3 approach: human readable and computable codes + unit that FHIR correctly adopted?✅

Vriendelijke groet,

Dr. William Goossen

Directeur Results 4 Care BV  
+31654614458

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [18 May 2016 21:00 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/openehr-technical-digest-vol-51-issue-17/16542/2 "2016-05-18T21:00:09Z")

</div>

That's not the v3 approach - it's ucum only. If ever I revisited the v3 data types. That would be one of my priorities to fix.

Grahame