The openEHR Specifications Editorial Committee (SEC) has published RM Release 1.1.0 today. Change-log | Issues fixed This release brings a number of important improvements to the reference model including: the new DV_SCALE data type, supporting scales/scores containing decimal numbers; addition…

That’s a lot of work, @thomas.beale and all. Thanks! I can’t see the change-log, release notes and issue’s fixed (Jira wall). Still working on it? :blush:

You’re right, I just tested this. It appears to be an Atlassian problem. We have raised a support issue there, and will try to find a workaround.

For those that have no proper access to JIRA, or somehow the release view is not working as expected, here is a list of release notes: Problem Report [ SPECPR-62 ] - Add a ‘reason for null’ text attribute in the Reference model [ SPECPR-85 ] - Add some place to put data on the FOLDER object [ SPECPR-25…

Hi! I believe we may have missed describing the new ITEM_TAG class in the spec documents, it is in the UML: https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/UML/latest/index.html#Architecture___19_0_3_8fe028d_1588000883570_669310_5583 …and it is listed in https://specifications.openehr.org/classes but …

Ah - that is an error - I forgot to remove these classes from the released UML source files (from which the site is generated) when we pushed the tag CR up to Release 1.2.0. Will fix…

This is now corrected - Release 1.1.0 Ehr IM . Global UML site - EHR class .

Quick question: Pieter mentioned that the specs allow negative DV_DURATION, but ISO8601 doesn’t seem to allow negative durations. Can someone confirm if we support negative durations and why? REF: https://github.com/openEHR/archie/issues/209#issuecomment-707070720

Hi Pablo, [image] Duration data type RM Hi all, We have always expressed the clinical notion ‘age’ as DV_DURATION. It was one of the first things I remember Sam telling me… ie the duration of time since birth. BUT there is a clinical situation where you can have a negat…

Thanks Ian, the usage is clear for me. My question is about the data representation including the sign in the duration expression, since it seems that is not ISO8601 compliant. In the model we have: ( https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/data_types.html#_overview_5 ) DV_DURATION v…

Hi Pablo, DV_DURATION is based on Iso8601_duration, from here in the Foundation types. This ensures it is a valid ISO8601 duration string. You already knew that I guess. You can see there an operation negative() that generates the negated form of a Iso 8601 duration value. However, I think you are …

openEHR Reference Model (RM) Release 1.1.0 published

openEHR news Releases

ian.mcnicoll (Ian McNicoll) 12 October 2020 16:00 9

Hi Pablo,

Ian

Topic		Replies	Views
openEHR RM Release 1.0.4 published Announcements (archive)	0	4	4 January 2019
RM Release 1.0.3 is published Announcements (archive)	0	2	15 December 2015
openEHR Release 1.0.1 UML online Technical (archive)	0	3	12 March 2007
Progress on Release 1.0.1 Technical (archive)	0	4	27 June 2006
openEHR Base Model (BASE) Release 1.2.0 published Releases release	0	1196	27 April 2021
openEHR Release 1.0 Technical (archive)	2	4	12 February 2006
openEHR RM Release-1.0.3 - EHR Extract - SURVEY OF USE Technical (archive)	0	1	19 November 2015
Announcement: forthcoming Release 1.0.1 Technical (archive)	0	5	15 May 2006
openEHR Release 1.0.2 published Announcements (archive)	0	2	31 December 2008
Updates to UML, package paths; new global class index. Technical (archive)	0	4	28 November 2017

openEHR Reference Model (RM) Release 1.1.0 published

Related topics