# New wiki space

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/new-wiki-space/13343>\
**Category:** Technical (archive)\
**Created:** [15 October 2009 23:30 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/new-wiki-space/13343 "2009-10-15T23:30:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/thomas.beale/32/35_2.png) [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)\
**Post date:** [15 October 2009 23:30 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/new-wiki-space/13343/1 "2009-10-15T23:30:04Z")

</div>

I have created a 'Terminology' space on the wiki. Initially I would like  
to get material from the recent IHTSDO meeting up there. The idea is to  
create very clear guidelines for archetype design, and to ensure the  
semantic congruence of archetypes and other aspects of openEHR with  
terminology. Remembering of course that openEHR is designed to work with  
any terminology, we will nevertheless be able to use a lot of the  
thinking coming from IHTSDO and SNOMED-CT.

See [http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Terminology+and+openEHR](http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Terminology+and+openEHR)

If anyone wants to add a 'key issue' I suggest you do it by modifying or  
commenting on the top-level page. Hopefully people from the terminology  
community, ontology community and also people from user organisations  
will help us collectively put some shape into this part of the wiki.

[note that for pure terminology-related discussions, of course the  
resources of IHTSDO and other organisations are of course more  
appropriate than here].

- thomas beale