# How is assumed value marked on domain types? (in XML)

**Category:** [Technical (archive)](https://discourse.openehr.org/c/technical-archive/156)
**Created:** 2012-01-05 12:04 UTC
**Views:** 5
**Replies:** 3
**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/how-is-assumed-value-marked-on-domain-types-in-xml/15123

---

## Post #1 by @yampeku

In ADL, the assumed value of a domain type is marked like this:

defining\_code matches \{
      \[local::
      at1000, 	\-\- Standing
      at1001, 	\-\- Sitting
      at1002, 	\-\- Reclining
      at1003, 	\-\- Lying
      at1014; 	\-\- Lying with tilt to left
      at1001\]	\-\- assumed value
\}

but in the xml form, the assumed value is missing\. The schema does not
reflect this \(I know it is outdated\)

<children xsi:type="C\_CODE\_PHRASE">
                            <rm\_type\_name>CODE\_PHRASE</rm\_type\_name>
                            <occurrences>
                              <lower\_included>true</lower\_included>
                              <upper\_included>true</upper\_included>
                              <lower\_unbounded>false</lower\_unbounded>
                              <upper\_unbounded>false</upper\_unbounded>
                              <lower>0</lower>
                              <upper>1</upper>
                            </occurrences>
                            <node\_id>at0009</node\_id>
                            <terminology\_id>
                              <value>local</value>
                            </terminology\_id>
                            <code\_list>at1000</code\_list>
                            <code\_list>at1001</code\_list>
                            <code\_list>at1002</code\_list>
                            <code\_list>at1003</code\_list>
                            <code\_list>at1014</code\_list>
                          </children>

Can we reach a quick consensus on how should this be stated? Can we
use an <assumed\_value> label as in all other types?

---

## Post #2 by @Heath_Frankel3

Diego,
What tool are you using to generate your AOM XML?
The tool issue tracker may be a more appropriate place for these tooling issues.
Heath

---

## Post #3 by @yampeku

I am using XMLserializer from Java implementation

---

## Post #4 by @system

Diego,
See me response to this on the java mailing list\.
Cheers,
Rong

---


**Canonical:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/how-is-assumed-value-marked-on-domain-types-in-xml/15123
**Original content:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/how-is-assumed-value-marked-on-domain-types-in-xml/15123