# Developing OpenEHR teaching material.

**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/developing-openehr-teaching-material/13315
**Category:** Technical (archive)
**Created:** [17 August 2009 10:08 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/developing-openehr-teaching-material/13315 "2009-08-17T10:08:40Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Derek\_Meyer](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/e36b37/32.png) [@Derek\_Meyer](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Derek_Meyer)
#### Post date: [17 August 2009 10:08 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/developing-openehr-teaching-material/13315/1 "2009-08-17T10:08:40Z")

</div>

Hi,

I am developing teaching material on openEHR for our undergraduate course.

Most approaches to teaching openEHR tend to be high level - explaining  
the need and advantages of using archetypes, guiding principles and so  
on. I am hoping to get away from this and to offer a more hands-on  
approach. My aim is to develop material that leads my students to an  
understanding of the problems of developing EHRs first, before  
demonstrating how openEHR attempts to overcome these difficulties.

I am looking for someone currently developing archetypes (or who has  
some they have developed in the past), who would be happy for their work  
to be adapted for use as a university case study, and is prepared to  
collaborate in developing this.

Many thanks,

Derek  
dmeyer@sgul.ac.uk

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Seref](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/seref/32/13_2.png) [@Seref](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Seref)
#### Post date: [17 August 2009 16:51 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/developing-openehr-teaching-material/13315/2 "2009-08-17T16:51:10Z")

</div>

Hi Derek,  
Could you please clarify the content you have in mind? Hands on openEHR usage spans quite a large set of topics. Are you interested in actual implementation of the specifications?  
From your message I get the impression that you are more interested in modelling. In that case, maybe clinical list may give you a better response to your query. We may be more helpful if you define your scope a little bit better.

Kind regards  
Seref
