# Demographics Archetypes

**Category:** [Technical (archive)](https://discourse.openehr.org/c/technical-archive/156)
**Created:** 2008-09-19 18:46 UTC
**Views:** 2
**Replies:** 7
**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811

---

## Post #1 by @Eddy_Rospide

> <br>All,<br><br>When I try to pull the demographics archetype from the following link on the OpenEHR website, I get a 404 error. Can someone test to see if they get the same error?<br><br>[http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/openehr-demographic-person.person.draft.html](http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/openehr-demographic-person.person.draft.html)<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Eddy Rospide<br> |

---

## Post #2 by @yampeku

I do

---

## Post #3 by @Tim_Cook2

There are some here:
http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/

but at least some of them do not conform to the openEHR RM\.

\-\-Tim

---

## Post #4 by @Antonio_Garcia_Linar



---

## Post #5 by @grahamegrieve

hi

Two of the demographics archetypes are open for review : postal address
and person name\. I appear to be the only one who has commented on
either, but the system seems to have lost my review of the person name
archetype?

I have mainly focused on interoperability with ISO 21090 \(healthcare
datatypes, which include name and address\)\. The archetypes are fairly
faithful to ISO 22220, and need a few features added to become effectively
interoperable with ISO 21090\. Heather and I are working on this for a
future release of 22220\.

In the meantime, the authors ask, what should the scope of these two archetypes
be? just a minimal 22220? My response is, they should have a few more specific
features added so that they are interoperable enough with 21090\. Due to
differences in approach, it&#39;s never going to be 100%, but it doesn&#39;t
really need to
be\. We can get to 99% fairly cheaply, and that&#39;s what I&#39;ve aimed at in
my comments\.

I thought I&#39;d raise it on the list here and get comment to help with
the author&#39;s
principle question\.

btw, to the authors: great job, thanks

Grahame

---

## Post #6 by @system

Grahame Grieve wrote:
> hi
>
> Two of the demographics archetypes are open for review : postal address
> and person name\. I appear to be the only one who has commented on
> either, but the system seems to have lost my review of the person name
> archetype?

Hi Grahame,

I can see your reviews of both archetypes in CKM, so be assured that
they are definitely not lost\.
If you go to the person name archetype and select reviews, I can see it\.
Not sure what the problem your are facing is? Don&#39;t you see it in a list
where you&#39;d expect it?

Regards
Sebastian

---

## Post #7 by @grahamegrieve

Because when I went to check the review generally, the review wasn&#39;t listed
nor was the review cycle\. \(both are available for address\)

Grahame

---

## Post #8 by @ian.mcnicoll

Hi Graham,

Thanks for the detailed reviews of both the Address and Name archetypes.

I can see your reviews and review cycles listed for both archetypes if I go to the Archetype concerned and then to Reviews - are you navigating differently.

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
[ian@mcmi.co.uk](mailto:ian@mcmi.co.uk)

Clinical Analyst Ocean Informatics [ian.mcnicoll@oceaninformatics.com](mailto:ian.mcnicoll@oceaninformatics.com)
BCS Primary Health Care Specialist Group [www.phcsg.org](http://www.phcsg.org)

2009/10/27 Grahame Grieve <[grahame@kestral.com.au](mailto:grahame@kestral.com.au)>

---


**Canonical:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811
**Original content:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811