# Demographics Archetypes **URL:** \ **Category:** Technical (archive)\ **Created:** [19 September 2008 18:46 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811 "2008-09-19T18:46:07Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1

**Author:** ![Eddy\_Rospide](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/22d042/32.png) [@Eddy\_Rospide](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Eddy_Rospide)\ **Post date:** [19 September 2008 18:46 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/1 "2008-09-19T18:46:07Z")

> All, > > When I try to pull the demographics archetype from the following link on the OpenEHR website, I get a 404 error. Can someone test to see if they get the same error? > > [http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/openehr-demographic-person.person.draft.html](http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/openehr-demographic-person.person.draft.html) > > Thanks, > > Eddy Rospide > | ---

**Author:** ![yampeku](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/yampeku/32/25_2.png) [@yampeku](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/yampeku)\ **Post date:** [19 September 2008 20:46 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/2 "2008-09-19T20:46:19Z")

I do ---

**Author:** ![Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/57b2e6/32.png) [@Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Tim_Cook2)\ **Post date:** [19 September 2008 22:21 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/3 "2008-09-19T22:21:17Z")

There are some here: [http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/](http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/) but at least some of them do not conform to the openEHR RM. --Tim ---

**Author:** ![Antonio\_Garcia\_Linar](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Antonio\_Garcia\_Linar](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Antonio_Garcia_Linar)\ **Post date:** [20 September 2008 10:38 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/4 "2008-09-20T10:38:30Z")

---

**Author:** ![grahamegrieve](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/grahamegrieve/32/3602_2.png) [@grahamegrieve](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/grahamegrieve)\ **Post date:** [27 October 2009 08:41 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/5 "2009-10-27T08:41:10Z")

hi Two of the demographics archetypes are open for review : postal address and person name. I appear to be the only one who has commented on either, but the system seems to have lost my review of the person name archetype? I have mainly focused on interoperability with ISO 21090 (healthcare datatypes, which include name and address). The archetypes are fairly faithful to ISO 22220, and need a few features added to become effectively interoperable with ISO 21090. Heather and I are working on this for a future release of 22220. In the meantime, the authors ask, what should the scope of these two archetypes be? just a minimal 22220? My response is, they should have a few more specific features added so that they are interoperable enough with 21090. Due to differences in approach, it's never going to be 100%, but it doesn't really need to be. We can get to 99% fairly cheaply, and that's what I've aimed at in my comments. I thought I'd raise it on the list here and get comment to help with the author's principle question. btw, to the authors: great job, thanks Grahame ---

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\ **Post date:** [27 October 2009 09:16 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/6 "2009-10-27T09:16:43Z")

Grahame Grieve wrote: > hi > > Two of the demographics archetypes are open for review : postal address > and person name. I appear to be the only one who has commented on > either, but the system seems to have lost my review of the person name > archetype? Hi Grahame, I can see your reviews of both archetypes in CKM, so be assured that they are definitely not lost. If you go to the person name archetype and select reviews, I can see it. Not sure what the problem your are facing is? Don't you see it in a list where you'd expect it? Regards Sebastian ---

**Author:** ![grahamegrieve](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/grahamegrieve/32/3602_2.png) [@grahamegrieve](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/grahamegrieve)\ **Post date:** [27 October 2009 20:20 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/7 "2009-10-27T20:20:33Z")

Because when I went to check the review generally, the review wasn't listed nor was the review cycle. (both are available for address) Grahame ---

**Author:** ![ian.mcnicoll](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/ian.mcnicoll/32/4430_2.png) [@ian.mcnicoll](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/ian.mcnicoll)\ **Post date:** [27 October 2009 21:08 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/demographics-archetypes/13811/8 "2009-10-27T21:08:27Z")

Hi Graham, Thanks for the detailed reviews of both the Address and Name archetypes. I can see your reviews and review cycles listed for both archetypes if I go to the Archetype concerned and then to Reviews - are you navigating differently. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657 mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 skype ianmcnicoll [ian@mcmi.co.uk](mailto:ian@mcmi.co.uk) Clinical Analyst Ocean Informatics [ian.mcnicoll@oceaninformatics.com](mailto:ian.mcnicoll@oceaninformatics.com) BCS Primary Health Care Specialist Group [www.phcsg.org](http://www.phcsg.org) 2009/10/27 Grahame Grieve \<[grahame@kestral.com.au](mailto:grahame@kestral.com.au)\>